3.2 The person-centered approach

3.2.1. Theoretical review

The person-centered approach has its aim on preserving the personhood and quality life of people with dementia. To harmonise care services offered with the wishes of the people who require them. In this way, the quality of life of the individuals is preserved.

Despite that the fact that nowadays there is a growing interest of this approach, it is relatively new in dementia care area. It emerged through the work of Tom Kitwood (Kitwood and Breding, 1992) and its later publications. Tom Kitwood’s person-centered approach is a criticism of the approach and treatment of people with dementia to the date. A care that emphasizes the person’s disability and illness, a degrading approach to people with cognitive disabilities that should be reviewed. He argued that they are at risk of depersonalization and exposed to negative social environments that can cause a catastrophic damage.

The definition of people-centered care is neither easy nor uniform. Below we offer you a definition, especially oriented towards people with dementia, as one of the main challenges posed by focused attention.

Dawn Brooker’s contemporary definition (2004):

First, the individual must be respected and valued as a full member of society.

Second, an individualized care plan must be developed in tune with people’s changing needs, with new elements of compensation and reinforcement as cognitive disabilities increase.

Third, you need to understand the perspective of the person with dementia. What meaning does that person give to their situation? What clues do we have about the latter?

Fourth, supportive social psychology must be offered in order to help people with dementia live a life in which they perceive relative well-being.

In his work, Kitwood emphasized six psychological needs that are essential to all people:

  • Love: unconditional acceptance and empathy.
  • Comfort: the person needs security, warmth and proximity.
  • Identity: is connected to know who one is and have a connection with the past.
  • Affiliation: linking ties, relationships with others. To experience confidence and trust in the relationship, so that you have someone to go to in difficult situations.
  • Meaningful employment: to participate in your own life in way that you use your abilities and strength and experience that you are needed and that you have  something to do
  • Inclusion: Being part of a social community and feeling accepted.

People with dementia need support to meet these universal needs.

Tom Kitwood believes that what he calls malicious social psychology can affect people with dementia so they get worse and worse and ultimately do not interact with the outside world or it can cause serious behavioral problems. The following are examples of what he means when he says malicious social psychology:

  1. Threats: to instill fear by using threats or physical power
  2. Neglect: Refuse to give the attention or fulfill an obvious need
  3. Too high pace: To give information too fast, to present choices or to expose the person to pressure to make things faster than person may endure
  4. Treat like a child: To treat a person downloading as if he were a small child
  5. Put stickers on persons: to prosecute or mention the person in an abusive way
  6. Downward assessment: to tell a person that he / she is incompetent, useless, and worthless
  7. Complaint: – To accuse a person of actions or lack of action arising from the person’s inability or misunderstanding of the situation
  8. Treason: To use forms of deception in order to distract or manipulate a person or force them to be compliant.
  9. Undervalue the person: Not to recognize the persons the subjective reality or feelings
  10. Disability – Do not allow a person to use the abilities he actually has; not being able to help him complete completed actions.
  11. Interference: – Force a person to do something to override the desire or refuse the appropriate options
  12. Interruption: – interferes suddenly or interfering with a person’s action or consideration: to commit gross breach on their frame of reference.
  13. Objectification: To treat people as if they were dead things.
  14. Stigmatization: To treat a person as if they had died from the outer room or a scum.
  15. Ignore: Continue speech or action with a third person as if the person is not present.
  16. Banishment: To send a person away or to exclude him – physically or mentally.
  17. Open up to ridicule: To make fun of someone’s “strange” actions or remarks, teasing, humiliating or joking at the expense of the person.

However, he also identified some elements of positive interaction that will improve the wellbeing of people with dementia.

Here a man or woman who has dementia is being acknowledged as a person, known by name, affirmed in his or her own uniqueness. Recognition may be achieved in a simple act of greeting, or in a careful listening over a long period – perhaps as a person describes an earlier part of his or her life. Recognition, though, is never purely verbal, and it need not involve words at all. One of the profoundest acts of recognition is simply the direct contact of the eyes.

The characteristic feature of this type of interaction is that people who have dementia are being consulted about their preferences, desires and needs, rather than being conformed to others’ assumptions. Much negotiation takes place over simple everyday issues, such as a person feels ready to get up, or have a meal, or go outdoors. Skilled negotiation takes into account the anxieties and insecurities that often pervade the lives of people with dementia, and the slower rate at which they handle information. Negotiation gives even highly dependent people some degree of control over the care that they receive, and puts power back into their hands.

Here we gain a glimpse of two or more people aligned on a shared task, with a definite aim in view. The true meaning of collaboration is ‘working together’, and this may be literally the case; as for example, in doing the same household chores. Less obviously, it can occur in contexts of personal care such as getting dressed, having a bath or going to the toilet. The hallmark of collaboration in care is that care is not something that is ‘done to’ a person who is cast into a passive role; it is a process in which their own initiative and abilities are involved.

Whereas work is directed towards a goal, play in its purest form has no goal that lies outside the activity itself. It is simply an exercise in spontaneity and self-expression, an experience that has value in itself. Because of the sheer pressures of survival, and the disciplines of work, many adults have only poorly developed abilities in this area. A good care environment is one which allows these abilities to grow.

This term refers to forms of interaction in which the prime modality is sensuous or sensual, without the intervention of concepts and intellectual understanding; for example through aromatherapy and massage. The word itself is a neoplasm, derived from the Greek word timao (I honour, and hence I do not violate personal or moral boundaries) and stimulation (with its connotations of sensory arousal). The significance of this kind of interaction is that it can provide contact, reassurance and pleasure, while making very few demands. It is thus particularly valuable when cognitive impairment is severe.

The ambience here is expansive and convivial. It is not simply a matter of special occasions, but of any moment at which life is experienced as intrinsically joyful. Many people who have dementia, despite their suffering, retail the capacity to celebrate; perhaps it is even enhanced as the burdens of responsibility disappear. Celebration is the form of interaction in which  the division between caregiver and cared-for comes nearest to vanishing completely; all are taken up into a similar mood. The ordinary boundaries of ego have become diffuse, and selfhood has expanded. In some mystical traditions, this is the meaning of spirituality.

Of all the forms of interaction, this is the one that has the lowest level of intensity, and probably also the slowest pace. It is possible, of course, to relax in solitude, but many people with dementia, with their particularly strong social needs, are only able to relax when others are near them, or in actual  bodily contact.

This term has a long history in psychotherapeutic works going back some time before Naomi Feil made it famous in dementia care. The literal meaning is to make strong or robust; to validate the experience of another is to accept the reality and power of that experience, and hence its ‘subjective truth. The heart of the matter is acknowledging the reality of a person’s emotions and feelings, and giving a response on the feeling level. Validation involves a high degree of empathy, attempting to understand a person’s entire frame of reference, even if it is chaotic or paranoid, or filled with hallucination. When our experience is validated we feel more alive, more connected, more real; there is every ground for supposing that this is true in dementia as well.

This, of course, is a metaphor, derived from the physical holding of a child who is in distress. To hold, in a psychological sense, means to provide a safe psychological space, a ‘container’; here hidden trauma and conflict can be brought out; areas of extreme vulnerability exposed. When the holding is secure a person can know, in experience, that devastating emotions such as abject terror or overwhelming grief will pass, and not cause the psyche to disintegrate. Even violent anger or destructive rage, directed for a while at the person who is doing the holding, will not drive that person away. As in the case of childcare psychological holding in any context may involve physical holding too.

At it simplest this means enabling a person to do what otherwise he or she would not be able to do, by providing those parts of the action – and only those – that are missing. Facilitation of this kind merges into what  have called collaboration. The more truly psychotherapeutic interaction occurs when a person’s sense of agency has been seriously depleted, or when action schemata have largely fallen apart. Perhaps all that is left is a hesitant move towards an action, or an elementary gesture. The task of facilitation now is to enable interaction to get started, to amplify it and to help the person gradually to fill it out with meaning. When this is done well there is a great sensitivity to the possible meanings in a person’s movements, and interaction proceeds at a speed that is slow enough to allow meaning to develop.

Here a person with dementia spontaneously offers something to the social setting, from his or her stock of ability and social skill. Two common examples are beginning to sing or dance, with an invitation to others to join in.

This is a form of interaction that approximates to the I-Thou mode. The person with dementia expresses concern, affection or gratitude; makes an offer of help, or presents a gift. There is sometimes a great sensitivity to the moods and feelings  of caregivers, and a warmth and sincerity that puts the rather frigid culture of ordinary Britain to shame.

Other authors that followed Kitwood’s footsteps, as for example Down Brooker, proposed “VIPS” model to carry out a person-centered approach.

3.2.2. Benefits of person-centred approach

There are several studies that have revealed positive results from the implementation of person-centred care (Epp, T.D., 2003). Improvements are the following: positive quality of life, decreased agitation, improved sleep patterns and maintenance of self-esteem.

Teresa Martinez, from acpgerontologia.com, summarise:

Benefits described in the centers that are committed to Person-Centered Care

Scroll to Top